Q015
What specific challenges
do small businesses face?
our take .
“You work for a person, not a company.”
It’s a common career adage, but in small companies, it can feel especially true—sometimes to the extreme. Teams are often described as families (and in some cases, they literally are). Knowing the people you work with and seeing your values reflected in leadership is one of the biggest draws of joining a smaller business. But that closeness also makes leadership transitions a lot trickier—for everyone.
Founders, in particular, tend to have a rare knack for recruiting. They’ve put something real on the line to start the business, so their energy and clarity of vision are hard to replicate. They're often deeply optimistic, able to pitch a future they’re actively building. That kind of passion is magnetic. It’s no wonder that, over time, many of these working relationships begin to feel like family.
And like the old Cheers theme song, even as the company grows, it still feels like a place “where everybody knows your name.” And usually more than that—people know your story, your family situation, and your contributions over time. Those kinds of bonds only form when leadership genuinely takes an interest in the individuals they hire.
That’s why when a founder leaves, the biggest risk to the company isn’t always strategic—it’s human. Others may leave, too. In a small business, losing just a few people can easily mean 10%, 20%, even 40% of the team walking out the door. And with them goes institutional knowledge, customer relationships, and hard-won capability. If enough of that leaves at once, it can signal the beginning of the end.
Some small businesses just aren’t built to survive that kind of shift. They’re what we’d call “untransferrable.” They might be strong businesses today, but if they can’t function without the current operators, ignoring that reality is unfair to the team. The better path is honest planning: merging with another company, transitioning key individuals with client continuity in mind, or even transparently winding things down. None of those options are failures—failure is pretending the problem doesn’t exist and leaving others to clean up the fallout.
That said, many small businesses can and do make successful leadership transitions. One reason we prefer to buy a portion of a company, rather than all of it, and to avoid sudden leadership changes when possible, is because it lets us do two key things:
Understand how the team operates without disruption, and
Show that we can build a working relationship with the people already trusted by the team.
In doing so, we get the chance to notice what really matters. Does the owner walk the shop floor every morning? Advisors might say that’s not essential—but to the folks showing up at 6 a.m., it probably means everything. Is there someone who’s skeptical of our involvement but implicitly trusts the current owner? With the right mindset and timeline, we can earn that trust. We might not replicate the original relationship, but we can build on its foundation. And then we can use those observations to develop a plan specific to the organization.
The bottom line is this: small businesses are powered by people. And there usually aren’t that many people, so losing a few can be a big deal. Any succession plan should take that seriously. Ask yourself: who’s most likely to leave if their “person” leaves—and what can you do now to make sure the outcome still works for everyone?
on paper.
character to consider: Vito Corleone
Relationships matter
Call it the ultimate family business. In organizations like the Corleone operation, personal relationships are the lynchpin of leadership decisions. For Vito, the question of who comes next is answered only through his love and expectations for each of his sons: Sonny’s impulsiveness, Fredo’s incompetence, and Michael’s reluctance, coupled with their family roles, outweigh considerations of merit and skill. And you’ll note that no one outside of the family is in the conversation. And then there are the consequences of broken relationships (we see you, Fredo). Betrayal and its fallout aren’t just professional missteps or hiccups but seismic fractures that can derail succession and, worse, family unity.
Options are limited
In the Corleone clan, succession planning isn’t just about operational continuity – it’s about maintaining the family as a singular, united entity. It’s high-stakes, and particular to very small and family-owned businesses. Thus the fundamental limitation: the next leader of the Corleone family must be one of his children. But they all have significant flaws, creating massive vulnerabilities. Where is the balance between familial loyalty and strategic foresight? Should you expand the definition of “family”? How do you square legacy with fit?
Legacy + Evolution
There is a succession (actually two) in The Godfather – that is, after all, the story. But the aftermath and the lingering influence of “What would Vito have done?” continues well into Michael’s tenure. Vito led through an old-world ethos of loyalty, respect, and negotiation. Michael came up in a harsher, more competitive environment. His ruthlessness is a redefinition of what it means to be Godfather and what it takes to survive when you step up in a small operation and a tight-knit (if blood-thirsty) community. What constitutes preserving the Corleone name while preparing for a new era is Vito’s succession question.
Works Consulted:
We welcome your questions, feedback, and suggestions as series installments are released. Our emails are:
Subscribe to receive new installments in the series.
The information, opinions, and views presented in this publication are provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted or considered as legal, tax, financial, or other forms of professional advice. All information, opinions, and views expressed herein are of a general nature and have not been tailored to address the specific circumstances or needs of any individual or entity. As such, they do not constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed. Readers should consult with their own legal, tax, financial, or other professional advisors regarding the applicability of this information to their own circumstances.
This publication may include links to third-party websites and provide access to other third-party content, such as articles, news reports, company information, or other materials (collectively, “Third-Party Content”). These links and resources are provided solely for your convenience and general informational purposes. Permanent Equity Management, LLC (“Permanent Equity”) does not endorse, approve, certify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party websites or Third-Party Content, nor does Permanent Equity imply any affiliation, partnership, or endorsement between us and the owners/operators of any third-party websites or the providers/creators of any Third-Party Content. Permanent Equity has no control over third-party websites or their content and disclaims any responsibility for their accuracy, security, privacy policies, or the quality of any products or services offered through them. Accessing third-party websites or relying on Third-Party Content is done entirely at your own risk. Permanent Equity is not liable for any damages, losses, or liabilities arising from your use of, access to, or reliance on third-party websites or any Third-Party Content. Any transactions, decisions, or actions made based on third-party websites or Third-Party Content are solely between you and the respective third party.
The information provided in this publication does not constitute investment advice, nor does it represent an offer to sell or solicit the purchase of interests in Permanent Equity or any private fund it advises. It is not intended for marketing purposes to existing or prospective investors in any jurisdiction and may be subject to correction, modification, or supplementation without prior notice. Permanent Equity provides investment advisory services only to the privately offered funds it advises and does not solicit or make its services available to the public or other advisory clients.