Appreciation for Depreciation

My favorite recent article about the people who generally accepted GAAP is this one about how some large public companies keep revisiting how long they expect recent investments in AI to last. 

This matters because depreciation is an estimate. If you can convince your accountants that a chip will be viable for longer rather than shorter, profits go up even though cash flow does not and nothing else about the business has changed.

What makes this odd is the context. These same companies describe themselves as investing rapidly and aggressively in a technology arms race. But if you’re investing rapidly and aggressively in an arm’s race, obsolescence is likely going up, not down and therefore depreciation should be happening faster, not slower. 

None of this is fraud, but it is deception, or at least sleight of hand, and all of those things tend to to be downstream of incentives. 

Depreciation, of course, shouldn’t be any of those things (it’s an abstract and boring accounting concept governed by convoluted MACRS schedules), but this is exactly why Charlie Munger (who I regret never meeting) called EBITDA bullshit earnings. While the logic of capital investment and depreciation makes sense, cashflow ultimately matters more than estimated longevity.

This also gets at the difference between growth and maintenance capex and whether spending is one or the other and how investors should think about that. 

If a business is building new locations to expand geographically, that’s clearly spending to grow. But if it’s buying ever-more-expensive chips to stay the same amount of competitive in order to retain subscribers, that feels more like maintenance even if the tech is getting better.

This is why we at Permanent Equity reconcile all things to Beer Money. Cash is reality, as our CEO Brent wrote in his most recent annual letter. Because you can’t buy beer with depreciation.

 
 

Tim


Sign up below to get Unqualified Opinions in your inbox.

* indicates required

The information, opinions, and views presented in this publication are provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. They are of a general nature, have not been tailored to the specific circumstances of any individual or entity, and do not constitute a comprehensive statement of the matters discussed. This material should not be interpreted or relied upon as investment, legal, tax, accounting, regulatory, or other professional advice, and nothing in this publication is intended to be or should be construed as such. You should obtain advice from your own professional advisors regarding the applicability of the information to your particular circumstances.

The views and analyses expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, opinions, policies, or positions of Permanent Equity Management, LLC, its officers, directors, employees, affiliates, or portfolio companies, or of any person or entity with whom the author may be affiliated. Permanent Equity Management, LLC makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability of the information contained herein and expressly disclaims any liability for errors or omissions.

This publication is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation of any security, financial instrument, or other product. It does not form the basis of any contract and does not create a fiduciary, advisory, or client relationship with Permanent Equity Management, LLC. Any examples or references to third-party content are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement. Permanent Equity Management, LLC is not responsible for the availability, accuracy, or content of third-party materials. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to change.

Next
Next

Idiosyncratic Assets